> Do connections between different areas stand out or form? It's just easier to make new habits (or add new information). ![]() It's about as easy to delete something as it is to change a bad habit. ![]() you can't easy delete (not after rehearsing something for years). With training even the recall becomes fast. With these systems you're training your mind to think a specific sequence of thoughts (in the act of recalling the experience of your mind palace). I naturally remember what was or wasn't part of the book. Then, I just add that knowledge to the appropriate room. So let's say I read a book and years later I realize that the author omitted something very important (IMHO). > Do you ever "refactor" you maps to show updated understanding? Or do you find that this happens naturally? We create self-paced courses to teach yourself computer science and it's an excellent way to do that, IMO. You can read my comics-based blogpost on the same: Īnd if you want to try out, I have released two free courses on Conversational Learning Platform: Think like your own chats on Whatsapp or FB. Their responses then act as "memory breadcrumbs" which helps to retrace the entire context. I propose using a conversational learning system, that forces learners to respond. I built something that exactly solves this problem:Ģ. How could I get more out of reading? So I memorized books. Next year it's gone, maybe I recall 3 ideas. > I used to read a book, maybe take notes and hopefully take some new action. But it gets a bit cumbersome at some point. I was into memory training after reading "Moonwalking with Einstein" (Excellent book btw). It feels like watching a vivid (albeit dreamy) movie.Īnyways, like anything the deep end of this mind training is totally amazing and unlike the initial "lifehack" quick wins. At the end of the day, I can mentally re-watch my whole day and catch interesting, things that I missed in the moment. With all this training, my ability to visualize has just gone through the roof. because those packages have become one chunk in my mind. Before coding I review the software development palace. Like when I think of argparse, I automaticaly think of clicklib and fire. When I find a better solution than something in the standard library, I attach that memory to the standard library. Why? Is it going to help? It provides a link to attach concepts to. ![]() I decided to memorize the packages of the python standard library. Eventually, I believe it's clearly possible to be able to memorize at the speed of speech (250 words per min).Īt the moment, I develop software. People can memorize a deck of cards (52 facts in order) in two minutes. Now reviewing a book (250 items) takes under 15 mins, and I can do it while making dinner or driving. My first book took about 4 hours and reviewing it took an hour. Now reading is unconscious, you see a word and instantly you know the concept behind. We've all spent thousands of hours learning to read. How is the relevant to my life right now? How can I apply this? How does the world look using this knowledge as a lens? How does this compare or contrast to other things I've memorized?Īt first this was an enormous effort. When recalling you can ask yourself questions about the knowledge. If I don't practice recalling my palaces, at least once every 6 months or so, I'll forget it. Convert a book into 100-250 bullet points, memorize them in a memory palace. ![]() I used to read a book, maybe take notes and hopefully take some new action. I also wanted to get more out of reading. How could they transmit enough knowledge to survive and basically confer PhD level knowledge of survival without books? How could they remember it all? How does your experience of the world change when every place you find yourself is (mentally) chock full of (your most prized) memories? I've trained my memory over the last ~5 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |